Breakdown voltage enhancement in GaN channel and AlGaN channel HEMTs using large gate metal height
Wang Zhong-Xu1, Du Lin2, Liu Jun-Wei1, Wang Ying3, Jiang Yun2, Ji Si-Wei2, Dong Shi-Wei3, Chen Wei-Wei3, Tan Xiao-Hong4, Li Jin-Long4, Li Xiao-Jun3, Zhao Sheng-Lei1, †, Zhang Jin-Cheng1, †, Hao Yue1
Key Laboratory for Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices, School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
Shanghai Precision Metrology and Testing Research Institute, Shanghai 201109, China
China Academy of Space Technology (Xi’an), Xi’an 710000, China
Sichuan Institute of Solid-State Circuits, CETC, Chongqing 400060, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: slzhao@xidian.edu.cn jchzhang@xidian.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Key Science & Technology Special Project of China (Grant No. 2017ZX01001301), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0400100), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51777168 and 61801374).

Abstract

A large gate metal height technique is proposed to enhance breakdown voltage in GaN channel and AlGaN channel high-electron-mobility-transistors (HEMTs). For GaN channel HEMTs with gate–drain spacing LGD = 2.5 μm, the breakdown voltage VBR increases from 518 V to 582 V by increasing gate metal height h from 0.2 μm to 0.4 μm. For GaN channel HEMTs with LGD = 7 μm, VBR increases from 953 V to 1310 V by increasing h from 0.8 μm to 1.6 μm. The breakdown voltage enhancement results from the increase of the gate sidewall capacitance and depletion region extension. For Al0.4Ga0.6N channel HEMT with LGD = 7 μm, VBR increases from 1535 V to 1763 V by increasing h from 0.8 μm to 1.6 μm, resulting in a high average breakdown electric field of 2.51 MV/cm. Simulation and analysis indicate that the high gate metal height is an effective method to enhance breakdown voltage in GaN-based HEMTs, and this method can be utilized in all the lateral semiconductor devices.

1. Introduction

GaN-based high-electron-mobility-transistors (HEMTs) have been promising candidates for high voltage and high frequency applications due to their superior material and device characteristics.[13] The critical electric fields for GaN and AlN are 3.3 MV/cm and 12 MV/cm, respectively, and the AlGaN material is a kind of ultra-wide bandgap (UWBG) semiconductor with better breakdown characteristics compared with the GaN material. The off-state breakdown voltage (BV) is one of the most important parameters for GaN-based HEMTs, and numerous studies concentrate on improving the breakdown characteristics.[46] For GaN channel HEMTs, a record high breakdown voltage of 3000 V has been achieved in InAlN/GaN MOSHEMT with gate–drain spacing of 30 μm.[7] In comparison, a BV of 1650 V has been obtained in AlGaN channel HEMT with gate–drain spacing of 10 μm.[8,9] In order to improve BV, several methods were employed, including source field plate (FP), gate FP, AlGaN back barrier, and high-k passivation layer.[1012] However, the gate–drain average breakdown electric field EBR values are much lower than the theoretical limitation ones for GaN channel and AlGaN channel HEMTs. For GaN-based HEMTs, it is difficult to achieve BV of 1 kV and EBR of 2 MV/cm simultaneously. It is essential to further improve the BV and EBR of GaN-based HEMTs.

In this paper, a simple method, large gate metal height, is proposed to enhance BV in GaN channel and AlGaN channel HEMTs. By using this method, breakdown voltage VBR of 582 V and EBR of 2.33 MV/cm have been achieved for GaN channel HEMTs with gate–drain spacing LGD = 2.5 μm. For AlGaN channel HEMTs with LGD = 7 μm, VBR and EBR can be improved to 1736 V and 2.51 MV/cm, respectively.

2. Device structure and simulation model

The GaN and AlGaN channel HEMTs structure adopted in this paper is shown in Fig. 1. The devices are simulated by using Silvaco-ATLAS software. For the fabricated GaN-based HEMTs, the drain and source metals should penetrate into the GaN buffer layer and be connected to 2DEG directly by an annealing process to form ohmic contacts. The drain and source contacts are designed as shown in Fig. 1 to simulate this process, and the contact length Lcon = 0.5 μm. The simulated HEMTs have a gate length LG = 1 μm, a gate–source spacing LGS = 0.5 μm, and a gate–drain spacing LGD = 2.5–9 μm. For AlGaN channel HEMTs, the aluminum compositions for the AlGaN buffer and AlGaN barrier layers are 40% and 70%, respectively.

Fig. 1. Device structure of the GaN and AlGaN channel HEMTs.

The electron mobility in the AlGaN barrier layer is set to 600 cm2/V⋅s.[10] The GaN or AlGaN buffer layer consists of two parts, namely, 10-nm channel layer and 1.99-μm buffer layer. In the channel layer, the electrons belong to 2DEG and their mobility is set to 1500 cm2/V⋅s according to the 2DEG mobility in previous studies.[13,14] The electron mobility in the buffer layer is set to 250 cm2/V⋅s, which is extracted from the GaN-based MOSFET.[15] In the buffer layer, we consider a shallow donor, a deep donor, and a deep acceptor.[12,16] The shallow donor is assumed to be ionized completely at room temperature, and its density is set to 1 × 1015 cm−3. The energy level and density of the deep donor are EC – 0.5 eV and 2 × 1017 cm−3, respectively. The electron and hole capture cross sections for the deep donor are 1 × 10−13 cm2 and 1 × 10−15 cm2, respectively. The energy level and density of the deep acceptor are assumed to be EC – 2.85 eV and 1 × 1017 cm−3, respectively. The electron and hole capture cross sections for the deep acceptor are both set to 1 × 10−15 cm2. The positive polarization charge is modeled as a positive fixed sheet charge with a density of 1 × 1013 cm−2 along the interface of the heterojunction. In this paper, surface states and gate tunneling model are not considered. The device breakdown is induced by the impact ionization. The impact ionization is modeled as α0 exp (−EC/E), where α0 = 2.9 × 108 cm−1 and EC = 3.4 × 107 V/cm.[17]

3. Results and discussion

As shown in Fig. 2, AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with various relative permittivities εr are simulated. The gate height h and passivation layer thickness t are 0.2 μm and 0.1 μm, respectively. The breakdown voltage VBR is defined as the drain voltage with the drain leakage current ID reaching 1 mA/mm. VBR increases with the increase of εr for one certain passivation layer thickness. For εr = 3.9 (SiO2), the breakdown voltage is 99 V. In contrast, VBR for the HEMT with εr = 28 (LaLuO3) is 346 V, which is 2.5 times higher than that for the HEMT with εr = 3.9. When the passivation layer thickness increases to 0.5 μm, VBR can be improved further to 518 V as shown in Fig. 3. The similar relationship between VBR and εr and between VBR and t is in agreement with the numerical calculation.[12] For a high εr or t, the electric field at the drain-side edge of the gate is weakened, and the applied voltage tends to drop uniformly.

Fig. 2. Off-state IDVDS curves for GaN channel HEMTs with various relative permittivities.
Fig. 3. Comparison of off-state IDVDS curves for GaN channel HEMTs with εr = 28, t = 0.5 μm, and h = 0.2 μm or h = 0.4 μm.

The impact of gate metal thickness h on breakdown characteristics is shown in Fig. 3, the breakdown voltage VBR increases from 518 V for h = 0.2 μm to 566 V for h = 0.4 μm. Figure 4 shows the electron concentration distribution in GaN channel HEMTs with h = 0.2 μm and h = 0.4 μm. The depletion region along the AlGaN/GaN interface can extend from X = 3.75 μm for h = 0.2 μm to X = 3.83 μm for h = 0.4 μm, indicating that a larger depletion region can be formed for a larger h. A larger h would increase the area of the drain-side wall of the gate and the gate sidewall capacitance. The increased depletion capacitance would enlarge the depletion region extension and improve the breakdown voltage. The relative permittivity of air is much lower than that of the passivation layer. In order to achieve a large gate sidewall capacitance, the passivation layer should be higher than the gate metal.

Fig. 4. Logarithmic electron concentration distribution in GaN channel HEMTs with εr = 28, t = 0.5 μm, VDS = 200 V, and (a) h = 0.2 μm or (b) h = 0.4 μm.

In order to investigate the impact of h on HEMTs with different LGD, the dependence of VBR on LGD is shown in Fig. 5(a). LGD varies from 2.5 μm to 9 μm while keeping t and h constant at 1.0 μm and 0.8 μm, respectively. The VBR of the HEMT with LGD = 2.5 μm is 582 V, which is 18 V higher than that of the same LGD HEMT with t = 0.5 μm and h = 0.4 μm. The increase of VBR results from the gate sidewall capacitance. For the HEMT with LGD = 2.5 μm, the average electric-field strength at the breakdown point (VDS = 582 V) is 2.33 MV/cm. The electric field between the gate and drain is very uniform for VDS = 550 V as shown in Fig. 5(b). VBR increases with the increase of LGD for LGD ≤ 5 μm and saturates at LGD = 5 μm. The VBR for the HEMT with LGD = 5 μm is 922 V and the electric-field distribution at VDS = 900 V is shown in Fig. 5(b). The breakdown strength decreases from 2.33 MV/cm to 1.84 MV/cm, indicating that the gate capacitance for t = 1.0 μm and h = 0.8 μm cannot form a sufficient depletion region to make the electric field even as in the HEMT with LGD = 2.5 μm. The electric-field curve for the HEMT with LGD = 7 μm almost overlaps with that for the HEMT with LGD = 5 μm for X = 2–7 μm (X = 2 μm is the starting point of LGD). Thus, the gate sidewall capacitance begins to saturate when LGD reaches 5 μm for t = 1.0 μm and h = 0.8 μm. In order to improve VBR further, t and h are increased to 2.0 μm and 1.6 μm, respectively. VBR of the HEMT with LGD = 7 μm is increased from 953 V to 1310 V. The average breakdown strength is increased from 1.36 MV/cm to 1.87 MV/cm. For a large LGD, a larger h can increase the gate sidewall capacitance more effectively, resulting in a larger depletion region and a more uniform electric-field distribution.

Fig. 5. (a) Off-state IDVDS curves and (b) electric-field distribution as a function of LGD for GaN channel HEMTs with t = 1.0 μm and h = 0.8 μm. Characteristics for the HEMT with LGD = 7 μm, t = 2.0 μm, and h = 1.6 μm are also drawn.

Figure 6(a) shows the output curves of the GaN channel HEMT with LGD = 7 μm, εr = 28, t = 2.0 μm, and h = 1.6 μm. The on resistance Ron can be extracted from the output curves as shown in Fig. 6(a). The specific on-resistance RON is defined as RON = Ron × (LGS + LG + LGD + 2Lcon). The dependence of VBR and RON on LGD is shown in Fig. 6(b). VBR increases with the increase of LGD for LGD ≤ 5 μm and saturates at LGD = 5 μm. The VBR is increased from 953 V to 1310 V by using a higher t and h for LGD = 7 μm. RON increases with the increase of LGD. For LGD = 2.5 μm, RON = 0.137 mΩ⋅ cm2. The RON is increased to 0.467mΩ⋅ cm2 for LGD = 7 μm. In addition, the h values have little effect on RON for a certain LGD. The power figure-of-merit (FOM) is as high as 3.67 × 109 V2⋅Ω−1⋅cm−2 for the GaN channel HEMT with t = 2.0 μm and h = 1.6 μm.

Fig. 6. (a) Output curves of the GaN channel HEMT with LGD = 7 μm, εr = 28, t = 2.0 μm, and h = 1.6 μm. (b) VBR and RON as a function of LGD.

Due to the higher critical breakdown electric field, AlGaN channel HEMTs have higher breakdown voltage compared with the conventional GaN channel HEMTs. Figure 7 shows the breakdown enhancement of gate metal height for Al0.7Ga0.3N/Al0.4Ga0.6N HEMTs. The breakdown voltage is increased from 1535 V to 1763 V by increasing from t = 1.0 μm, h = 0.8 μm to t = 2.0 μm, h = 1.6 μm. Due to the effect of alloy scattering in the AlGaN channel HEMT, the electron mobility would be reduced, leading to higher RON of 2.15mΩ⋅ cm2 and lower FOM of 1.44 × 109 V2⋅Ω−1⋅cm−2. The electron mobility can be improved by utilizing a buffer layer.[18] The average breakdown electric field is increased from 2.19 MV/cm to 2.51 MV/cm, which is much higher than that of GaN channel HEMTs. The potential distributions in AlGaN channel HEMTs with t = 1.0 μm, h = 0.8 μm and t = 2.0 μm, h = 1.6 μm are shown in Fig. 8. With higher gate sidewall capacitance, the potential distribution is more even and BV is enhanced. Besides the gate metal thickness, the field plate thickness could reduce the peak at the FP edge and further improve the BV. The BV enhancement mechanism of large gate metal height is similar to that of slant FP, namely, using the sidewall capacitance.[19] However, the slant FP structure requires a precise etching process to form the designed slope angle. Compared with the slant FP, the large gate metal height is more controllable. The large gate metal height would increase metal cost. In order to reduce the metal cost, metal pleating can be used instead of evaporating or sputtering process, and low cost metal can be employed instead of gold metal.

Fig. 7. Off-state IDVDS curves of Al0.7Ga0.3N/Al0.4Ga0.6N HEMTs with h = 0.8 μm, t = 1.0 μm and h = 1.6 μm, t = 2.0 μm. LGD = 7 μm, εr = 28.
Fig. 8. Potential distribution of Al0.7Ga0.3N/Al0.4Ga0.6N HEMTs with (a) h = 0.8 μm, t = 1.0 μm and (b) h = 1.6 μm, t = 2.0 μm. LGD = 7 μm, εr = 28, and VDS = 1000 V.
4. Conclusion

A large gate metal height is proposed to enhance BV in GaN-based HEMTs. For GaN channel HEMTs with LGD = 2.5 μm, VBR and EBR are 582 V and 2.33 MV/cm, respectively by using this method. The breakdown voltage enhancement results from the increase of the gate sidewall capacitance and depletion region extension. For larger LGD HEMT, larger h is essential to improve VBR effectively. For the HEMT with LGD = 7 μm, VBR increases from 953 V to 1310 V by increasing h from 0.8 μm to 1.6 μm. Compared with the GaN channel HEMT, VBR of the Al0.4Ga0.7N channel HEMT is improved from 953 V to 1535 V. By increasing h from 0.8 μm to 1.6 μm, VBR of the Al0.4Ga0.6N channel HEMT is further increased from 1535 V to 1763 V. Simulation and analysis indicate that the high gate metal height is an effective method to enhance breakdown voltage in GaN-based HEMTs, and this method can be utilized in all the lateral semiconductor devices. Besides the gate metal height, a larger field plate height can be used to enhance BV with the same mechanism.

Reference
[1] Wu Y F Saxler A Moore M Smith R P Sheppard S Chavarkar P M Wisleder T Mishra U K Parikh P 2004 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 25 117
[2] Mishra U K Parikh P Wu Y F 2002 Proc. IEEE 90 1022
[3] Imada T Kanamura M Kikkawa T 2010 Proc. IEEE Power Electron. Conf. 1027 10.1109/IPEC.2010.5542039
[4] Zhang N Q Keller S Parish G Heikman S DenBaars S P Mishra U K 2000 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 21 421
[5] Treidel E B Hilt O Brunner F Würfl J Tränkle G 2008 IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 55 3354
[6] Wang M J Chen K J 2011 IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 58 460
[7] Lee H S Piedra D Sun M Gao X Guo S Palacios T 2012 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33 982
[8] Nanjo T Takeuchi M Suita M Oishi T Abe Y Tokuda Y Aoyagi Y 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 263502
[9] Nanjo T Imai A Suzuki Y Abe Y Oishi T Suita M Yagyu E Aoyagi Y 2013 IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 60 1046
[10] Karmalkar S Mishra U K 2001 IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 48 1515
[11] Xing H L Dora Y Chini A Heikman S Keller S Mishra U K 2004 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 25 161
[12] Hanawa H Onodera H Nakajima A Horio K 2014 IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 61 769
[13] Ma X H Yu H Y Quan S Yang L Y Pan C Y Yang L Wang H Zhang J C Hao Y 2011 Chin. Phys. 20 027303
[14] Lian Y W Lin Y S Lu H C Huang Y C Hsu S S H 2012 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33 973
[15] Wang Y Wang M Xie B Wen C P Wang J Hao Y Wu W Chen K J Shen B 2013 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34 1370
[16] Horio K Yonemoto K Takayanagi H Nakano H 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 98 124502
[17] Kunihiro K Kasahara K Takahashi Y Ohno Y 1999 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 20 608
[18] Xiao M Zhang J Duan X Zhang W Shan H Ning J Hao Y 2018 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 39 1149
[19] Dora Y Chakraborty A McCarthy L Keller S DenBaars S P Mishra U K 2006 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 27 713